How the Class Stacks Up
The NCAA lifts the coaches gag order today as well. Jim Tressel spoke at 4pm presser and highlighted various aspects of the class. If you missed it, Press Box Productions has you covered with the archived audio. Ohio State only hosted official visits for 26 players and they signed 19 of them. That's what you call efficient. But, looking at the team rankings by Rivals and Scout, you'll quickly notice we have the fewest number of recruits of any team in the Top 12 (Scout). Only USC (18) has fewer of any team in the Top 25.
Speaking of Rivals and Scout, both services have the class ranked in the Top 10. There's little discrepancy too as Scout checks us at #7 and Rivals one spot down. From a conference standpoint, the Buckeyes take the imaginary crown with Michigan close behind. Interestingly, Michigan took surprising commitments from two Ohio players today, both of whom were not offered scholarships by Ohio State. So, back to Ohio State's class; here's our position according to Scout:
First off, I have no idea
why Texas A&M's class is highlighted along with
ours. Pay no attention. Do pay attention to the
quality of our class. If one sorts the classes by
'star rating', Ohio State's suddenly vaults to #2
behind only Notre Dame. If you do the same
rearrangement for the Rivals rankings, we hop to #5.
In other words, these rankings you see listed and
spit out by various media outlets, your local paper,
your local Buckeye hater value not only the quality
of the player but the number of commitments.
Quick example, LSU is ranked one spot ahead of us in
the graphic above only because they signed 7 more
players.
The class is excellent in quality, though one could
have hoped for another offensive lineman (or two).
Even still, should Pryor commit, the class would be
one of Ohio State's best.





